Jeff asked:


I found this article:

April 1, 2004 —
WHAT could have been worse than 9/11? How about follow-up attacks in Chicago and Los Angeles only weeks later?
That was the plan, according to Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, alleged al Qaeda operations chief now in custody. According to the Sunday Times of London, Khalid told U.S. interrogators that the Library Tower in Los Angeles and the Sears Tower in Chicago were the terror group’s “next targets” following the 9/11 atrocity that claimed 3,000 Americans. “We were looking for symbols of economic might,” said Khalid. “The original plan was for a two-pronged attack with five targets on the East Coast of America and five on the West Coast.”
What stopped them? “Decisive U.S. response to the New York and Washington attacks, which disrupted the terrorist organization’s plans so thoroughly that it could not proceed,” said Khalid. “Before 9/11, we could dispatch operatives with the expectation of follow-up contact, but after Oct. 7 [the beginning of U
U.S. bombing in Afghanistan] that changed 180 degrees.”
Will this revelation change some American minds 180 degrees? President Bush’s departure from prior administrations’ “business as usual” response to global terror likely saved thousands of lives in two of our largest cities. Those critical of our “war-mongering” president should take note – and be very, very grateful

captpcb216 asked:


I’ve asked this question before and haven’t had a decent answer. Some f$%k stick with a degree in engineering once tried to explain how the debri from towers 1 and 2 some how ignighted deisel fuel tanks in building 7 and fire caused the building to collaspe. Larry Silverstein said live on pbs that they made the call to pull the building and then we watched the building come down.!!! He had the lease on the building for gods sake. Pull when used in that context means DEMOLITION. I want to how that building came down and why?? If it came down with explosives then they had to be placed well in advance and that means that the attack on Sept 11th was an inside job period. Is it a coincedence that Larry Silverstein owns the Sears tower or leases hell i forgot . Every building he has anything to do with seems to fall from a “terror attack” or be threatened with a terror attack. WTC………….WTF!!!!!!

captain_koyk asked:


Why are half-baked and unfeasible plots trumpeted as high victories in the war in terror?

Is it time to redefine “threats to our way of life” when the current definitions include: A plan to take down the Brooklyn Bridge with a blowtorch, A plot to “blow up the Sears Tower” by losers in Miami who probably couldn’t find Chicago on a big roadmap, and the completely inept Fort Dix crew?

So what is our terror threat condition today? Orange? Be afraid, be VERY afraid…and vote Republican!

Watch these two videos and decide for yourself…

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/08/14/olbermann-the-nexus-of-politics-and-terror/

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/06/04/olberma

loubean asked:


Zarqawi….no big deal….
WMD’s….no big deal…Bush planted those.
Plot to blow up Sears Tower thwarted? Bush made that up too…
You guys are backing yourselves into an awful small corner…
If you look back in history…all Presidents during times of war had low ratings…it goes with the territory. And, since when to libs have the upper hand?

Mr. Smartypants™ asked:


We know that Lucky Larry hit the jackpot on 9/11 when he bought the WTC complex on 9/11 when “Al Qaeda” blew up WTC 1,2 and 7. He put down $124 million and made $4 billion after the attacks and he even demanded $ 3 billion more from the insurance company!

After 9/11 he bought the Sears Tower because maybe he thought he would get lucky again. Sure enough, a plot was discovered where “Al Qaeda” was going to blow up the Sears Tower. What are the chances? What does Al Qaeda have against “Lucky” Larry Silverstein?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/wplg/20071002/lo_wplg/14250806

http://www.infowars.com/articles/terror/liberty_city_plotter_working_for_feds.htm

corpuscollossus asked:


I read two articles via American papers that positioned the supposed Sears Towers terrorists as Islamic extremists, and then was shocked to see an interview with one of the group where he claimed they were Christians “who trained through the bible”…

So why the misrepresentation?

MY SWEET JEFFY BOY-BUSH MOANS asked:


Exaggerated Threat against the Sears Tower

They had no operational ability beyond their mouths.

Group “never met Bin Laden or had any contact with the terror kingpin’s henchmen… In fact, they had no connection to any known terrorist organization.”

No bomb making materials were found in the raids.”

Chicago Police: There was “No credible threat… They had no capability to (destroy the Sears tower). They never got to that point – or could have.”
# Sears Tower executive: “Law enforcement continues to tell us that they have never found evidence of a credible terrorism threat against Sears Tower that has gone beyond criminal discussions.” (Chicago Sun-Times)
# Senior federal law-enforcement source: “No means” to attack Sears Tower or other buildings. “There was no threat at all.” (Chicago Tribune)
The timing of the raid, given that there was no immediate operational threat, appears politically motivated. The Bush Administration wanted to scare Americans and tie the Iraq War to terror after a Senate debate on redeployment that very morning.
Bush has said for years that the point of going to Iraq was to draw out terrorists there to prevent them from coming here. If anything, the most newsworthy aspect of this story is that the suspects were largely American citizens, operating within our borders, and not even Arab, which means that our focus on War in Iraq does not address threats that could be more immediate.

SO BASED ON THIS REPUGLICON THEORY…WE CAN ARREST SEXUAL ******** FOR JUST THINKING ABOUT
DOING IT?

True American Patriot asked:


As preface, this is in the politics section because I had yet another bogus deletion in this section.

Yesterday, I responded to yet another question about “Bawney Fwank,” an unflattering name for Congressman Barney Frank. I responded by saying that getting rid of the r’s so that it reads like a Boston accent seems to be a fad around here.

And yet again, it has been deleted. Yesterday, I had an answer deleted for accusing someone of playing the race card when they asked if Obama is going easy on the five black men who plotted to bomb the Sears Tower in Chicago.

If these answers violated the “Community Guidelines,” then it is the Y!A equivalent of being pulled over for doing 66 MPH in a 65 MPH zone.

Also, it is my belief that I have a troll after me who is reporting my answers solely because he/she disagrees with what I have to say.

And yes, I am aware that the mods will delete anything that is reported without necessarily reading it, probably because they never learned to read at anything beyond the third grade level.

So what are the chances that these deletions were the work of a troll?
FYI Lemon, I am a liberal. But two violations on one question? Someone must really **** you. But I promise you that it isn’t me.
Again Jane, I am a liberal. Bogus deletions are a totally bipartisan endeavor. But everything else you said is true.

Mele Kai asked:


I watch alot of PBS. I have seen Skyscrapers and numerous documentries about how NYC was built, including Sears tower etc. The underground networks on the island are extensive. I don’t have sources beyond these shows. DO you?
Manhattan Island ? ANyone know about Boston as well? Separate yet but I wonder. Swissair 111 was on it’s way forget Halifax and any smoke in the cabin. Another story. Washington Post has it and never returned my research.
Maybe they will someday soon. Pilots out there? Pan, PAn Pan, not mayday. And what does that mean? Hijack for you civilians. Went down after it left JFK before 9-11.
Seriously, if you know about plans like the water blocks by the Twin towers or others please elaborate.
Serious only.
dumb is a tag suits u
if I can read regualr papers
watch regular TV
U think I am alone! GASP I just let out
high level secrets
get a clue earthworm the links r there
and these bad boys have security clearances

Bust yourself for stupidity TY

up420oz asked:


“Jurors deadlock in 6 of 7 defendants in Sears Tower plot”

MIAMI – One of seven Miami men accused of plotting to join forces with al-Qaida to blow up Chicago’s Sears Tower was acquitted Thursday, and a mistrial was declared for the six others after the federal jury deadlocked.

The mistrial means prosecutors will have to decide whether to retry the six men.

The outcome was a setback for the Bush administration, which had seized on the case to illustrate the dangers of homegrown terrorism and trumpet the government’s post-Sept. 11 success in infiltrating and smashing terror plots in their very earliest stages.

Lyglenson Lemorin, who was not the alleged ringleader, was acquitted.

Feel any safer with another con prez?

if yes, why???
Nice freedom of speech in the US of A.:

“The judge, who imposed a *** order on all lawyers in the case, refused a request by Lemorin’s lawyer, Joel DeFabio, for Lemorin to be allowed to speak with reporters after the verdict.